We’ve always allowed teams to move to open cities. The moves have worked to foster competitive balance as weaker divisions invite stronger teams to move into their area, which equalizes things quite a bit. With the OOTP economic system and AI-run franchises in place, the process is more complicated. Despite the impediments, I favor having a process available for franchise moves because, ultimately, it’s all about the actual humans having fun.
There are three moving scenarios: 1) a team moves to a market with no current team; 2) a GM quits his job and takes over an AI-controlled team, and 3) a team swaps its market with an existing AI team market.
The first two scenarios are straight forward.
In Scenario 1, if a team is moving to a bigger market, I just change the team name, stadium, and market information (Market size, Fan Loyalty, and Fan Interest (with a temporary bump like expansion teams get); if the team is moving to a smaller market, it’s a little more complicated because the budget will need to be adjusted downward and the moving team’s budget will need to shrink.
Scenario 2 is the easiest. The human GM quits his job. The Commissioner fires the GM on the AI team. The human GM gets hired by the former AI team. The human GM’s old team becomes AI run. Essentially, I just flip-flop GMs and AI/human control.
Scenario 3 is by far the most complicated. The John Henry shuffle from Miami to Boston says it can happen in real life, however.
Unfortunately, we don’t have any real money component to balance out a move. In my mind, if you are moving from a larger market to a smaller market, I would simply flip-flop budgets. If you are moving from a smaller market into a bigger market, however, and to make it more realistic, you’d have to pay some type of compensation for the difference between budgets for the first three years of the move.
The Foundation of WLB Economics
As long-time league members know, our league has always had an economic component. Initially, way back in 1990, our economic system was modeled on Rotisserie Baseball. Over time our economic system became more realistic (and complicated). Eventually, it pretty closely mimicked MLB, with one major difference, the range between the top and bottom teams was compressed to 60%.
When we moved to OOTP, it’s was a fairly simple process to integrate our finances with OOTP’s way of doing things. What helped the process was the extensive research and testing I undertook to make the transition pretty seamless. First, I worked to set realistic markets (detached from the way OOTP does it). Next, I looked into real-life fan loyalty research. From there I established base market sizes and fan loyalty settings. I then ran a large number of OOTP season simulations for data to generate a workable model of its franchises.
Here are the settings that I came up with for each market.
My research suggests that I can fairly reflect OOTP’s economic model (a 90% correlation). Our three-year game experience supports my original research.
With that in mind, I estimated the changes in revenue for each market. The relevant numbers are the colored dollar figures in the last column. The top markets are our current markets. The bottom available markets are broken down with Fan Interest of Avg (89 in our league), Max (100), and Min (45). These are estimates of how much revenue/budgets will change by moving to different market.
All teams equalized to Average Fan Interest.
These are the numbers I will use to generate compensation for exchanging markets with AI teams.
If you look at the numbers above closely, you’ll notice that Fan Interest has a very large direct impact on revenue/budgets. With that in mind, it’s important that we factor in changes to Fan Interest when a team decides to leave a market and move to another market.
In OOTP there is a viewable Fan Interest rating. This rating is based on a hidden base Fan Interest rating and a hidden Fan Interest Modifier. The base hidden is slower to change. The hidden Fan Interest Modifier fluctuates and changes more quickly. It gets added to hidden Fan Interest and impacts the viewable Fan Interest. Things that impact the Modifier include stuff like signing or losing a popular player.
When expansion takes place in OOTP the Modifier gets set at 100. With that in mind, I’m incorporating a factor for franchise moves. I’ll use 75 as base change to the Modifier. The time a team announces when it is moving will determine what percentage of the modifier will be added/subtracted. If the move is announced before the season begins 75 will be subtracted from its modifier for its last year in the market. The following season, 75 will be added to its modifier. Otherwise games played / 162 will dictate the percentage.
For example, in 2021 Oakland announced that it is moving after its 49th game. 49/162 = 30%. Oakland’s Modifier will be reduced by 53 points ((1-.3)*75) in 2021. In 2022 when the move becomes official, it will be increased by 53 points. (Seattle will be reduced by 54 points after playing 45 games. San Francisco will be reduced by 38 points.)
Our team Budgets are based on the previous year’s Revenues. Teams that move will have their initial Budgets determined by their end-of-season revenues. Teams that move will keep their previous year’s end-of-season revenues. (This is based on the assumption that revenues will drop after the Fan Interest Modifier is adjusted. If the Commissioner finds this does not operate as expected, the calculation may be changed.)
Our 2021 team Budgets.
Teams announce a move during the playoffs with the following provisions: 1) the team stays in the same division another year; and 2) since the team doesn’t take a hit on Fan Interest before moving, it gets no bump in year one at the new location. All other provisions stay the same. (Added 10/2/2021.)
Teams may only move once every three years. Human teams must pay 75 IP$ to move their teams. Teams that aren’t active don’t earn incentive points, so they may not move.